Jon Carl; Munson II

C/o posting location 6613 Pepin Drive

Upper Marlboro  [20772]without recourse

State of Maryland

 

 

 

 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY

 

Universal Bank, N.A. Subsidiary of Citigroup,

 

 

          Plaintiff,

     vs.

 

JON CARL MUNSON II”,

 

          Accused

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 0602-0023889-2001

 

Supplemental Administrative Notice and Affidavit for Post Judgment Relief

Supplemental Administrative Notice and Affidavit for Post Judgment Relief

 

Indeed, no more than [affidavit] is necessary to make the prima facie case.  United States v. Kis, 658 f.2d 526 (7th Cir. 1981); certiorari denied, 50 U.S.L.W. 2169. S.Ct. March 22, 1982.

 

Introductory Certification

 

Affiant, the living, breathing, sentient man known by the appellation “Jon Carl; Munson II, the Undersigned Affiant, hereinafter “Affiant,” does hereby solemnly swear, declare, and state as follows:

1.              Affiant is competent to state the matters set forth herewith.

2.              Affiant has personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.

3.              All the facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, and certain, not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth to the best of Affiant’s knowledge and understanding, and if called upon to testify as a witness Affiant shall so state.

Plain Statement of Facts

A. Statement of Cause

4.   WHEREAS:  the above-entitled tribunal did enter a money judgment in the amount of $16,600.71 against Affiant on the April 17, 2002 in the instant case; and

5.   WHEREAS:  the Attorney General for the State of Maryland has determined that Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution for the united States of America remains binding upon the State of Maryland and all political subdivisions thereof; and

6.   WHEREAS:  Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution for the united States of America expressly mandates: “No State shall make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts”; and

7.   WHEREAS:  Congress has no Constitutional authority to authorize or require the State of Maryland to do something that the Constitution for the united States of America expressly forbids the State of Maryland to do; and

8.   WHEREAS:  in the Coinage Act of 1792 Congress declared and defined “lawful money” as consisting of gold and silver, and Congress has not since declared otherwise; and

9.   WHEREAS:  a misbehaving Congress has removed gold and silver Coin, lawful-money dollars, from free circulation within the State of Maryland contrary to Constitutional design; and

10.  WHEREAS:  of the many judicial rulings of conflicting opinion upon the subject of “tender” “Acts of Congress making notes of the United States a legal tender do not apply to involuntary contributions in the nature of taxes or assessments (fines) exacted under State laws,” Hagar v. Land Reclamation District 108, 111 U.S. 701 (S. Ct. 1884), is controlling; and

11.  WHEREAS:  all State Constitutions, being pari materia to Article XI, Section 1 of the Constitution of Oregon, expressly prohibit the circulation of private bank paper (i.e. federal reserve notes) as money; and

12.  WHEREAS: Affiant does not have any lawful-money dollars and is estopped from obtaining any lawful-money dollars at par value; and

13.  WHEREAS:  it is a long- and well-established maxim of Law that Law cannot require the impossible; and

14.  WHEREAS:  government, at every level, is Constitutionally restrained from taking private property without “making” just compensation (i.e. lawful-money dollars) and

15.  WHEREAS: all elected, appointed, and hired agents of the State of Maryland, including the officers of the above-entitled tribunal, have given promissory oath under the seal of the State of Maryland to observe and obey the Constitutional and lawful restraints and mandates enumerated herein supra; and

16.  WHEREAS:  it is the lawful responsibility of the government of the State of Maryland to ensure that Congress mint and freely circulate lawful-money dollars within the State of Maryland in order that the state and its Citizens are able to extinguish debts in accordance with Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution of the united States of America; and

17.  WHEREAS: neither the State of Maryland, nor its political subdivisions, nor the officers and agents thereof possess the lawful authority to punish the individual Citizen for, or as a result of, said negligence; 16. supra,

B. Demand for Cause

18.         THEREFORE: let it now be known that the Undersigned Affiant, the living, breathing, sentient man known by the appellation “Jon Carl; Munson II, is, by law, insolvent before the above-entitled tribunal because of congressional mischief, and does hereby Demand Relief from aforementioned

money judgment entered on the April 17, 2002 against Affiant by an agency of the government that has, through neglect and violation of Constitutional law, estopped Affiant from extinguishing the aforementioned money-judgment debt in accordance with Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution for the united States of America and the positive law made in pursuance thereof; and that this lawful Demand is made under the authority of Article I, Section 10, Articles IV and VI of the Constitution of the united States of America and the Bill of Rights (1791).

C. Statement of Intent

19. It is Affiant’s intent to enjoy and exercise Affiant’s natural and God-given Rights as guaranteed and secured by the Constitution of the united States of America (1787), the Bill; of Rights (1791), and the Constitution of Maryland (September 18, 1867), including, and especially, Affiant’s right to extinguish Affiant’s debts and receive “just compensation” in accordance with the express provisions of said instruments supra, legislative acts to the contrary notwithstanding.

D. Caveat and Notice to Trespassers

20.  This SUPPLEMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE AND AFFIDAVIT FOR POST JUDGMENT RELIEF constitutes notice to all who would subject Affiant to a deprivation of Affiant’s rights; that willful disregard for, or disobedience of, the Constitutional restraints enumerated herein supra, including but not limited to any and all forms of retaliatory action taken by the above-entitled tribunal, directly, indirectly, or by said tribunal’s instruction, by any individual or agency, is actionable, inter alia, for covenant and constructive trespass on the case, from whatever action necessary and lawful, taking into consideration the moral gravity of the deprivation(s) in the particular case;

E. Verification

21.  The Undersigned Affiant, the living, breathing, sentient man known by the appellation “Jon Carl; Munson II, does herewith swear, declare, and affirm that Affiant issues this SUPPLEMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE AND AFFIDAVIT FOR POST JUDGMENT RELIEF with sincere intent, that Affiant is competent to state the matters set forth herein, that the contents are true, correct, complete, and certain, admissible as evidence, and reasonable and just to the best of Affiant’s knowledge.

30.  This SUPPLEMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE AND AFFIDAVIT FOR POST JUDGMENT RELIEF will be incorporated into and made a part of any legal proceeding arising from any controversy concerning the subject matter set forth herein.

Notice to the Principal is Notice to the Agent
Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal
Exodus 20:15,16

Further Affiant Saith Naught.

_____________________________         Date: May 2, 2002

 

 

 

 

 

Jurat

 

State of Maryland             )          

                              )       ss.

County of ____________________)

Subscribed and sworn to at ________________ before me this 2nd day of May, A.D. 2002.

                                    Notary public _______________________

                                    My Commission Expires _______________

                                    WITNESS my hand and official seal.

                                    ____________________________________

                                    Signature of Notary Public

 

 

 

Acknowledgment

 

State of Maryland             )          

                              )       ss.

County of ____________________)

 

On May 2, 2002 before me, _______________________________,

personally appeared Jon Carl; Munson II, personally proved to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in his/her authorized capacity, and that by his/her signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.

 

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

 

_____________________________________

                   Signature of Notary Public